J. L. Spohr
  • Blog
  • Books
    • Sword & Shield
    • Heirs & Spares
    • God & King
    • Crown & Thorns
    • Folke
  • About
    • Contact
  • News/Events

herod the king in his raging

12/28/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
An Advent Meditation in Light of the Tragedy in Connecticut  

There are certain parts of the Christmas story I just don’t like much. Namely, the wise men.

Now don’t get me wrong, the wise men – sometimes called the magi – are far superior to, say, the shepherds, as far as bringing exotic intrigue and holy mystery. But I’d really like to make the next part of their story – the slaughter of the innocents – go away. It’s kind of like the story of Noah. You’ve got Noah’s astounding faithfulness and aren’t the animals so cute and, oh yeah, everybody else dies a horrible death.

Here’s how Matthew puts it in his Christmas narrative.

When the [Magi] had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. "Get up," he said, "take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him."

 So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod… When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was fulfilled: 

            “A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.”

Right in the middle of this wondrous story about heavenly hosts and followed stars and baby Jesus, is this horrid, despicable act of ignorance and violence, executed by a man made miserable by his own fear. Right in the middle of the glorious, we have horror.

Rabbi Irving Greenberg offered the following "working principle" response to the silence of many Christians during the Holocaust. "No statement,” he said, “theological or otherwise, should be made that would not be credible in the presence of the burning children.”

He’s right.

We can’t sit and talk about how wonderful God is in the face of such atrocious displays. The only true response to horror is lament.

And that’s what Matthew gives us: a deep, timeless lament. It’s Rachel, mother of Benjamin and Joseph, dead hundreds of years, weeping, refusing to be comforted. A cry from the very grave, to bring down the heavens. There is no comfort here. Little children have been recklessly slaughtered. A voice is heard in Ramah…

As moving and upsetting as this episode is, the most troubling thing for me is not the killing. The most troubling thing for me is the lack of divine intervention.  Yes, the slaughter of the innocents, on Friday and two thousand years ago, is absolutely and unequivocally evil. And so was the Rwandan genocide, so is the trade in children for slavery, so is severing of limbs for diamonds. Horrible and abhorrent things happen all around us, every day. That does not make them ok, it makes them grotesque facts of life.

But wait a minute.

Jesus was spared.

And that’s what really sticks in my craw about this story: both Joseph and the wise men are warned by that angel. None of the other parents are warned.  Historians believe there were probably around thirty to forty toddler boys killed.

What, an angel doesn’t have time for forty visits in a night? All the other angels were busy? Why did these other parents have to suffer? Why did God not intervene for them too?

That’s the rub.

I mean that’s The Question: why horror? Why are some left to suffer and others not? If God is a loving God, why does anyone suffer?

Why do generations of mothers keep having to weep for their children?

I could conjure all sorts of theologically dry answers like, “There’s free will, and if we can chose to love that also means we’re free to be evil,” and, “Sometimes there’s the devil,” and on and on and on. Theological gymnastics may satisfy our intellect, but they won’t satisfy Rabbi Greenburg. Nor will they satisfy Rachel.

And seriously, God, you were there – you were right there sending angelic visions to two other houses that night. Why not a couple dozen more?  “Well Jesus was the important one and he couldn’t die then because He wouldn’t fulfill His mission…” And again we get in this merry-go-round of trying to get God off the hook. As Bono, from U2 croons, “Stop helping God across the street like a little old lady.” 

Of course, Jesus ultimately didn’t escape slaughter. No matter what you believe about his divinity, He indeed suffered an ugly, bloody, long, and torturous death.  And the cry of Rachel that rang out in the desert of his boyhood, reverberated yet again at the foot of His Cross. A voice is heard in Jerusalem, weeping and great mourning, Mary weeping for her child and refusing to be comforted, because He is no more.

Yet that doesn’t answer Rabbi Goldberg. I don’t why those children of Bethlehem couldn’t have lived. But what I do believe is this isn’t where the story ends.

As is true throughout most scripture, if a writer quotes just a bit of a psalm or other poem, the writer is implying the whole. The Jeremiah poem that Matthew is quoting about Rachel comes smack dab in the middle of God promising restoration to Israel, the grand gathering up of God’s people into God’s kingdom. It’s full of statements like this:

Again you will take up your tambourines and go out to dance with the joyful.

Maidens will dance and be glad, young men and old as well. I will turn their mourning into gladness; I will give them comfort and joy instead of sorrow. 

And to Rachel, God proclaims:

Restrain your voice from weeping and your eyes from tears, for your work will be rewarded, declares the LORD. They will return from the land of the enemy. So there is hope for your future, declares the LORD. Your children will return to their own land.

Right in the middle of hell is hope. Freedom. Joy.

Is the suffering of little children somehow necessary to achieve such freedom and hope? No. Hope can exist without horror, freedom without suffering, joy without weeping. Theoretically, it is possible.

But human history has not played out that way.  Instead, reality has played out in violence, pain and heartache. It’s as if Matthew is telling us, yes, what Herod did was hideous, but truly I tell you that one day our hopes will be realized. Your mourning will be turned into gladness – you will have comfort and joy instead of sorrow.

Not this day; this day these children are mourned. But one day, Matthew says, this Jesus, this babe who escaped, one day, He will bring justice. He will one day bring hope. He will one day bring joy.

When Jesus finishes telling the disciples about the end of the world, describing unimaginable death and destruction, he says, “I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world."

Take heart…take heart.

The message of Matthew and of Jesus is that the God who is only love, the God who suffers with us and through us and for us, and welcomes us home, has overcome this world of horror and hate and in its place brought love and hope.

So that’s my prayer this week of advent. That we could all, somehow, some way, take heart.

How do you take heart in the midst of suffering – or can you? What is your prayer this season? 


0 Comments

Happy Christmas to all

12/24/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Top of the Stairs

Yellow shag carpet itches through flannel Christmas pajamas

Unicorn shaped slippers squirm on size seven feet

Waiting.

At the top of the stairs.


Light laughter of Mom and Dad

And the smell coffee float up to tiny noses

Bacon crackles on the stove

“Up on the House top” swells to a close

And then hush descends.

The silence between tracks.

Mom clears her throat.

Waiting.

By stockings filled to bursting.

Little lips are bit, eyes grow wide.

Willing the walls to transform to windows

Waiting

At the top of the stairs

Then it comes,

That sweet release

“Kids!”

And elephants descend,

Tripping over unicorned feet

From the top of the stairs.


What are your Christmas morning memories? Any parents have a new perspective watching your own kids? Do share, and Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!


0 Comments

Oh Baby!

12/4/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
You heard it here first. Or maybe fifth: Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton are pregnant. Really Kate’s the one who’s pregnant. But we’re in enlightened, egalitarian times, so we’re supposed to say “they” are pregnant. 'Cause, you know, Prince William, someday King of England, is going to be changing a lot of nappies. Be sure to send him some royal burp cloths.


And of course dear Prince Wills isn’t the one suffering from “morning sickness.” Another horribly inappropriate term. Because it isn’t just in the morning. It is all. Blasted. Day. And night. Ad infinitum.

The poor princess has a severe form called hyperemesis gravidarum which is an “extreme, persistent nausea and vomiting during pregnancy that may lead to dehydration.” Translation: the princess is puking. Or feels like puking. Probably every half-hour.

I had this lovely affliction myself. Have you ever had the norwalk virus? That nasty one people get on cruise ships? Cake walk compared to “morning sickness.”

My diet consisted of saltines and lollypops.

Everyone said I should really feel grateful because it meant the baby was strong. Or the baby was a vampire. These same people kept asking me if I had tried ginger. Ginger lozenges, candied ginger, ginger tea, gingerbread, ginger powder, I even sucked on raw ginger. Ginger? Now, when I see that damnable root in the produce aisle, I want to beat it to a fine pulp with that broom the produce guy always leaves by the cantaloupe, and leave the sad, mangled ginger there to suffer as I had suffered.

Part of the problem was expectation. Morning sickness in movies is just what it sounds like: queasy when you wake up, a small prayer to the porcelain god, then suddenly one blossoms in to that glowing and gorgeous earth-mother, womb of all creation pregnant lady. Many of my friends who had gone before me into and out of this blessed state, experienced just that. A little urp in the morning and then a toss of that none-of-your-hair-falls-out-when-you’re-pregnant-so-it-looks-like-a-Pantene-commercial hair. Not so at Chez Spohr.

Thus, people thought I was a wuss. Which, admittedly, I am, but this was no wuss factor. This was chemo patient anti-nausea drugs not helping “morning sickness” that lasted twenty-two weeks. That’s five and a half months people!  And believe me, when my children are of the eye-rolling age, they will be reminded of it, ad nauseam. Then I’ll just give them a saltine and smile. Or maybe some ginger.

Now I know you all out there have some tales to tell too, so do share.

0 Comments
    Want updates? 
    Sign up!

    Archives

    January 2019
    June 2018
    December 2017
    April 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    July 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Authors I Love
    Books For All Seasons
    Cancer
    Celebrities
    Contests
    England
    Food
    Grief
    Holidays
    Media
    Men
    Mental/physical Health
    Movies
    Musings
    My Books
    Parenthood
    Pop Culture
    Royals
    Scotland
    Spirituality
    The Patriarchy
    Writing

    RSS Feed